The Professional's Choice for Entertainment Research

Our Clients | About Us | FAQ | Contact Us

Research Wrap Blog

The Decline of Western Civilization Part III: The Daytime Soap Opera

Posted by ashley on Wednesday, June 23, 2010 in AuthorJim Romanovich - President Worldwide Media and Entertainment - Associated Television InternationalMedia ResearchTV Blogs • (14) CommentsPermalink

Past Television ViewingThe Daytime Emmy Awards has been a staple for soap opera fans in particular since they first aired on May 21, 1974.  Nearly four decades later, many questions are being asked not just about this event but about the daytime soap opera itself.  In its heyday back in the 1980s the revenue generated by the daytime soaps was in large part the driving force that financed a great deal of what we saw in primetime.  That’s right.  The Young and The Restless was indirectly financing Falcon Crest and DallasGeneral Hospital was financing Dynasty! On General Hospital over 30 million people watched Luke and Laura’s wedding in November of 1981. Stars who began in the soaps, such as Meg Ryan, Demi Moore, and John Stamos were becoming superstars in other areas of entertainment. Being on a top rated daytime soap was the place to be!

Flash forward to January 2009 and the news was that the Daytime Emmys were dead.  Not mostly dead.  But DEAD dead.  When our company, Associated Television International (ATI), entered the scene shortly thereafter, it was in true soap opera form.  The viewers were at the Daytime Emmys wake when all of a sudden the body popped up out of the coffin just like a great Friday cliffhanger on The Bold and the Beautiful would do.  Yes, the Daytime Emmys drew new breath and it not only seemed alive, but also vibrant.  We saved the Daytime Emmys and made sure it was seen on network television at least one more time last August 29, 2009 on the CW .  Did we kick-start something new? Or did we just prolong its decline? To answer that, we have to go back twenty years to see all that led up to January 2009.

Although the 80s were considered a mostly boom decade of excess, the daytime soaps especially enjoying this period, it was the wet blanket of the latter part of that decade and early 90s that proved how quickly things can turn.  Remember all those interchangeable hair metal bands of the 80s?  It took one Nirvana, who reflected a new generation of less idealistic kids, to kill them all.  It was the same thing for the soap opera.  On October 19, 1987, known as Black Monday, the stock market suffered the worst single day loss in its history of continuous trading.  Although we recovered rather quickly at that time, it did sound out the bartender’s “last call” as the party was winding down. Everything was changing.  A more serious, somber tone replaced the frivolity of the previous seven years. American families needed a two income household just to make ends meet so more women, mothers actually, went to work. The first wave of a noticeable decline in soap opera viewing came during the Gulf War when television viewers, via CNN especially, got an inside look at the drama of war in real time.  We had front row seats as the quiet anticipation of Desert Shield evolved into the action fury that became Desert Storm. Even the name, Desert Storm, sounded like a Bruce Willis thriller. But it wasn’t.  It was real life being captured on my television in my living room.  The lure of this new way of presenting the news, which ultimately led to the modern reality show format, permeated the thought process of programmers who tried to capitalize on what was certainly engaging television.  Even Dan Rather in his nightly news was forced to acknowledge CNN’s stunning coverage from the Al-Rashid hotel in Baghdad stating, “I guess they’re not the little cable network anymore!”  He was right as he unintentionally foreshadowed the beginning of the end in the dominance of the nightly network news.

The decline in ratings for the daytime soaps was apparent for most with the exception of the Young and The Restless, which actually had a three year resurgence, claiming the top position from General Hospital in 1988 with an 8.1 rating and climbed to an 8.6 rating by 1993. In 2010, they have dropped to a 3.7 rating and are still number one despite losing more than half of their audience.  This is a dismal statistic on the daytime soap itself if a 3.7 is considered the best rating.  So what Black Monday began in 1987 and further escalated in 1991 with the Gulf War coverage, it wasn’t until the event of June 1994 that forever changed the landscape of not only daytime television, but television itself with a giant exclamation point –OJ!

From the shocking murder of his ex-wife Nicole and Ron Goldman, to the Bronco chase, to the endless gavel to gavel coverage, viewers were inundated with a real life soap opera that just got more fascinating with each passing day.  When the Simpson case finally ended on October 5, 1995, we literally had a sixteen month soap opera story arc acted out by memorable characters, Friday cliffhangers, and the latest CSI technology that kept us glued to every word, every witness, and every angle.  The characters of Johnnie Cochran and Kato Kaelin were created in this play in a way that only real life could write.  As terrible as this tragedy was, it made for must-see television.  How could anything created in a soap opera compete?

It couldn’t.

Once the trial was over and the soaps were able to resume their five day a week schedule, most viewers lost interest, flipped channels, or stayed at their jobs that they initially had to take to help support their families.  For those still at home, it was difficult to get back into the daily rhythm of a soap opera when the Gulf War and OJ opened up the world of Jerry Springer, cable television and the Internet.  Oprah was more interesting because her topics were real life soap operas and once you get the real thing handed to you every day, it’s kind of hard to watch “pretend” reality with that same vigor.

The soaps, however, did counter with more outrageous storylines and quicker pacing.  Days of Our Lives introduced a devil possession storyline that ended up backfiring on the core of the show itself (ironically, the ratings went up for the next five years but this was most likely due to NBC promoting the show though its number one sitcom, Friends, when Matt LeBlanc’s character, Joey Tribbiani, landed a role on the soap). General Hospital went from fantasy/sci-fi stories to dark, violent characters by making the mob the focus of the show rather than its super heroes.  Stories on many of the soaps were revolving around plot devices rather than characters in order to keep the trigger-happy TV audience tuned in.  What were seen as attempts at revitalizing a genre did nothing more than attempting a complete design makeover for the Titanic moments after it hit the iceberg.  While we have seen phenomenal uses of direction, technology, interesting stories, and great actors in today’s daytime soaps, the hemorrhaging over the last two decades has been too great to even sustain, let alone build, the genre in this current format. 

In January 2009, the biggest celebration of daytime came to a screeching halt when the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (NATAS) had no outlet for their once-prestigious event.  Like the soaps, producers tried all sorts of new angles from utilizing the Internet, to having flip cameras on dinner tables, to actually having the audience on stage.  It didn’t work and the Daytime Emmys became the first casualty of many to come related to the soaps.  Enter Associated Television International (ATI).  Helmed by Emmy Award-winning producer David McKenzie, I was given the task of all tasks, under his direction, of getting the rights to the event and then a broadcaster.  Along with David, we did.

I told NATAS that if they gave us the rights, we would guarantee the Daytime Emmys would get a network deal in three weeks.  Through our association on other projects with MGM, which controlled a Sunday night two-hour block on the CW, we were able to put together a great deal for everyone.  The CW, although not the strongest on all networks, catered to a much different audience- young females.  Young women are the most sought after demographic to replenish the genre’s viewership if it has any chance at all of surviving. Our goal was not to win any ratings points.  It was just to prime the well by bringing back the image of the Daytime Emmys we all remember, first and foremost, give the soaps a platform to reach a new demographic, and then to entertain the audience for two hours.  Vanessa Williams as host sang, danced and had a lot of fun.  It was a classy, elegant event that reminded us that this is what the Daytime Emmys was always about.

It was also the lowest rated Daytime Emmys in history with a rating of 0.6/2 in 18-49, 2.72 million viewers.  Critics relished this result, but I remained unfazed.  I predicted it would be the lowest rated event weeks before the broadcast.  It was never about the ratings. It was a sold-out event.  It was about creating a renaissance with something that was pronounced DEAD dead just eight months before.  In that, we succeeded mightily.  For the record, critics failed to acknowledge what I call the “apples to apples” comparisons which were the ratings of the show versus the CW's prior 4-week time period average. The Daytime Emmy Awards telecast, in fact, was +81% in total viewers, +122% in HH, +50% in W18-49, +57% in W25-54, +20% in W18-34, +20% in A18-49, +17% in A25-54 and +25% in A18-34.  And do you know what else this lowest rated event got us? The Las Vegas Hilton and CBS for 2010.  If the show was such a bomb, then no amount of charm and smiles from me would get this result if the Daytime Emmys didn’t strike a positive chord with both the Las Vegas Hilton and CBS.  Because 2009 was a very good show and now with the Las Vegas element, we have returned it to its full glory that it hasn’t seen in years.  With a tribute to Dick Clark and American Bandstand, Regis Philbin, Cheech and Chong, Barry Manilow, The Blue Man Group, Cher, Simon Cowell, and Ryan Seacrest to name a few, this year’s Daytime Emmys has all the elements to rank among the best.

But is it enough?  Will the Daytime Emmys be saved?  Will the daytime soaps be saved?  I really don’t think so. Not that it matters, but I don’t think the ratings will do better than what they did the last time they aired on CBS, although they will have a more entertaining program than in years past.  Most importantly, we have no plans to produce next year’s show and, without us, I’m fearful that the show will go back into oblivion. It could very well be a dinner with a webcast or it could be incorporated into the Primetime Emmys. I hope it can continue even if we aren’t involved.  But no other production company, with the exception of Dick Clark Productions, has shown such care for the genre than us.  If we do come back, it’s because we have a good reason to do so.  But we don’t know how we can top this year and I’d rather we go out on a creative high note.

And what about the soaps?  Well, we lost Guiding Light last year and As The World Turns this year.  Ironically, the last tape date for ATWT was Thursday, June 24th, with its final airdate September 17th.  This leaves six soaps- One Life To Live, All My Children, General Hospital, Days of Our Lives, The Young and the Restless, and The Bold and the Beautiful.  I predict two more will be gone in five years with all leaving daytime by 2020.

But where one door closes, another opens.  Just as radio before it, television is morphing into the Internet and I believe this is where your favorite soaps can not only survive, but thrive.  The Internet and television will soon be one and the same and I am confident that these soaps can continue in shortened versions of their current formats very successfully, creatively, and financially if someone smart enough can find a way to monetize it.  Perhaps the Internet can give us a truer impact of these viewers that archaic measuring systems for television have not.

The soap opera has been around since man starting telling stories.  The way we tell them is constantly changing and we shouldn’t be afraid of that.  But as for the daytime soaps continuing on network television, I believe no amount of great storytelling, stunt casting or magic tricks is going to change the momentum that began twenty years ago.  I know fans blame the soaps for killing themselves. I say it was going to happen anyway. The fans are too emotionally involved and take news of their shows very personally. Especially bad news. But I think the strongest shows have done an admirable job maintaining their viability on network television in spite of these obstacles. 

The end is coming. The toothpaste is out of the tube. Once producers fully grasp that the end will come and that they have a huge and loyal fan base to support them is when they can focus on that next step with these remaining six series rather than watching their slow deaths.  Now if only they would…

The 37th Annual Daytime Emmys hosted by Regis Philbin airs live on Sunday, June 27th from 9-11pm Eastern/Pacific (taped delayed) on CBS.

 

Jim Romanovich, President Worldwide Media and Entertainment - Associated Television International, is entering his 25th year in show business as an actor, producer, and distributor.  He began his professional career as a morning disk jockey on Chicago radio, appeared in various television projects, and produced several top rated series and specials for SyFy, PAX (now ION) Spike, TNT, Discovery, MyNetwork, and the CW.  Having been employed by ATI for the last 20 years, he was instrumental in bringing The Daytime Emmy Awards as well as The Hollywood Christmas Parade successfully back to television in 2009 and again in 2010. He has been interviewed and written extensively on the daytime television market, past and present media, as well as his passion for classic movies and television. He has consulted companies establishing media divisions and mentors graduates in the entertainment field.  He is one of Eastern Illinois University’s most successful graduates and was just ranked #18 in TV Guide Canada’s 25 Most Powerful Persons in Daytime for 2009.

Jim Romanovich

Comment 1:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 25, 2010 at 07:12 AM

This guy tells it straight! Where are we going in this Country re: Television? Are we relegated to hour upon hour of Reality TV? Can we really stand yet another version of Survivor? Or Batchelor? What does ths say about us as a creative people? Wake up America. Wake up Hollywood..Time to take some risks to bring us back to real entertainment.

Comment 2:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 25, 2010 at 03:07 PM

Great story sir, you explained the actual points in time when the hemorrhaging started very well. Thank you for the insight and good luck with your telecast this year. I hope you do well.

Comment 3:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 25, 2010 at 03:56 PM

Maybe the problem is more financial versus weak stories on the soaps?  If the networks cannot, or are not, able to make the soaps work out $$wise, consider moving to cable or pay cable.  These stories have a loyal audience that would follow them just about anywhere.  Just a thought.

Also, I agree that the TV Networks/Cable Programmers ought to be able to develop some shows that are not repeats.  With America’s sudden love for America’s Got Talent and American Idol, might the time be ripe for [gasp!] a Variety Show?  just a thought from a disappointed TV viewer.

Comment 4:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 28, 2010 at 06:22 PM

Thanks Lee.  You’re absolutely right.  They are financial.  When money is down, you tend to go to extremes to reinvigorate your direction.  I think cable should have been the place with SoapNet, but that is going away. By the time these shows end, the Internet will become that vehicle if those that own the shows make use of it and the shows’ loyal fan bases.

Comment 5:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 28, 2010 at 07:21 PM

Do you really believe the devil possession storyline didnt cause the ratings to spike but Joey from Friends did? I highly doubt this but I guess your entitled to your own opinion.

Comment 6:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 29, 2010 at 02:32 AM

Thank you for telling us nothing we didn’t already know about the so-called end of soaps on television.  I don’t understand why you had to be so negative.  The fanbase will *not* simply follow the soaps to the Internet, the Internet is always going to be more of a niche than network television.  It’s worth fighting to keep the soaps, and the Emmys, on the air.  ABC is to be commended for its dedication to its soaps, and I hope your article doesn’t come become a tipping point for them to cancel. 

Harrumph!

Also if you love soaps so much, why did ATWT get only a minute, why were there no clips of the actors’ performances, why was even Agnes Nixon’s tribute lacking (all ABC people, no mention of Irna Phillips, no writers giving tributes)?

Thanks for reviving the Daytime Emmys for 2 years, but the ceremony on Sunday was *very* toppable I’m afraid.  The Vegas shows co-presenting in particular were a complete flop.

Comment 7:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 29, 2010 at 04:09 PM

Jim, you can either be proactive or reactive with your soaps.  You tend to be reactive as to what you didn’t like.  That’s fair, although I didn’t see you in any network meetings or at any of the soaps production offices, because only then would you really know why things occur as they do. The type of show you want to see is the type that ultimately killed the Daytime Emmys in early 2009. It’s a celebration of all daytime, not a thesis of the soap opera.  The soaps are represented more than 80%  in our show when they only make up 5% of daytime as a whole. We won the night, the reviews on production were the best, and because of us, daytime got its much needed boost in the arm on network television.  Writers giving tributes? You think folks sitting in Des Moines want to see a bunch of writers on stage or in interviews talking about anything?  Or would they rather watch the Jersey Boys perform? This isn’t NPR.  This is television and our ONLY job is to entertain. Why did ATWT get a minute?  Because that’s how it was sent to us and then CBS made additional adjustments. But you didn’t know that.

Here’s the reality for all awards shows.  They were all dying because they were becoming boring, self congratulatory events.  Once they remembered that this was television and that they actually had to entertain the audience is when the ratings picked up.  As far as the Daytime Emmys, the news was much worse.  It was dead and the soaps were declining rapidly.  First the awards show, then GL and then ATWT.  Two more will be gone for sure in 5 years maybe sooner.  You can face that fact and be proactive or ignore it.  No network wanted the Daytime Emmys for prime time because nobody cared about the soaps.  Even the daytime programmers didn’t want the show just in case you’re wondering why ABC doesn’t run it at noon like the old days.  As the soaps fade, less emphasis is given to them which means most Americans don’t know who these people are anymore.  It’s sad but true.  They know Judge Judy and Dr. Phil. They don’t know Agnes Nixon if you can believe that (who thoroughly loved the show and was quite moved).  The soap fans alone are not enough to keep the Daytime Emmys going.  You need a wide net to make it worthwhile and to do so you have to entertain because that’s why people tune in.  As for avid soap fans who only want to see clips and awards, then you may have to go to the internet someday anyway because that’s where you’ll find them.  As valid as your views are, you are in a very small minority otherwise we wouldn’t have had to do what needed to be done to save it.  You would have had the Soap Digest Awards this year instead (an event I always enjoyed, by the way). If you read all the blogs from this vocal minority, you will notice that if you were to actually incorporate every criticism into the awards show or soaps in general, you would have a complete mess because you all have honest opinions-that only affect you.  It’s like yelling at Bears coach Lovey Smith on the tube when the Bears make a play I don’t like.  Must be a coach who is clueless, right?  No, I’m clueless. I wasn’t there for the pre-game chatter.  I didn’t practice with them.  I wasn’t there for half time. I wasn’t there when they were recruiting. But somehow I know all the answers?  Not a chance.  Simply because I watch the game on TV does not mean I have supreme insight into how a team is financed or coached or whatever.  Why then would you think that simply because you watch the soaps and the Emmys that you know how to produce them? I’m not being critical of you as I truly respect the fans and you should know by many of my interviews that I’m not a gun for hire.  I actually watch and like these shows.  I talk to the producers and stars, I give them an outlet for promotion in many vehicles.  But fans need a reality barometer if they truly want to save their shows. You need to be objective and look at the last three years in particular.  If you don’t think the soaps are in trouble on daytime television, then I can say nothing more about it that will mean anything to you. As far as the Emmys, it was a huge success on a mass level especially for the soap community. I’m here because I am a soap fan.  I’m also a soap fan with access you don’t have.  I take that information and present it to the community as to the facts of what is happening and what I believe will occur shortly.  It’s the law of momentum.  If you throw a football, the rise and fall is easily predicted.  Same here.  But every obstacle I present is always ended with a solution if the fans want one.

Comment 8:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  June 29, 2010 at 04:19 PM

Katie-I didn’t say that.  I said it backfired on the core of the show itself. 

Days EP Ken Corday is quoted in an interview at We Love Soaps as saying “My theory is that you are only as good as the cornerstone, the first stone you lay.  The premise of the show, which was rural, off the urban track U.S.A., was much more about family values, generations, and the redemptive power of love.  Back in 1965, not to be critical of the other soaps, but they were not focused on that subject the way DAYS was.  I really think that still speaks to the show.  It’s very kind that you find it uplifting.  There have been times it’s been a bit strange, when you have people possessed or buried alive.  And then with a quick ‘Our father…‘it’s all over, or a quick unearthing, it’s all over.  But we learn from our mistakes as well.”

Comment 9:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  July 17, 2010 at 04:44 PM

All things come to an end in the world of entertainment, even Soap Operas.

To their accomplishment, they lasted a hell of long time and made the networks a lot of money.

Comment 10:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  July 18, 2010 at 08:47 PM

I say get rid of all soaps and replace their time slots with something useful such as old tv programs that aired on each respective channel.

part of the reason television in general sucks nowadays is that it always forgets where it came from. They throw the shows that made the channel what it is under the bus for new shows that are currently popular (but by no means a classic).

I’d much rather spend an hour watching some episodes of The Jeffersons or MASH than an hour of a pointless soap.

Comment 11:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  July 18, 2010 at 08:51 PM

Also, I have always felt it was a cop out to blame news events such as wars and trials for why soaps suck.

Soaps don’t need trials and wars to brings its ratings down, they do a good job of that all on their own.

The sooner people stop trying to blame the outside world for why the soap world is crumbling and face up to the fact that the way they have been doing soaps the last decade are the reason for its own decline, then the problems can be worked on and solved.

Comment 12:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  July 23, 2010 at 10:14 AM

Loidel-your issues are with a genre, not the circumstances.  It’s akin to arguing religion or politics in this case.  You hate them therefore they must suck.  The facts say otherwise.  Ever watch LOST or DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES?  Both are soaps. The genre is doing just fine.  The COST of doing a drama in DAYTIME is the issue and those economics for all the reasons mentioned are why those that air in daytime are in decline.

Comment 13:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  August 02, 2010 at 03:21 AM

I found your article incredibly insightful and very well-written. I am a 60 year old woman who started watching soaps as a child in the late 50s during the summer, and gave them up completely in the late 1990s when every single one of the ones I had watched faithfully for years turned into something I couldn’t recognize. Occasionally, I would drift back, be disgusted, and tune out. How these soaps managed to alienate an audience that was once so loyal they would bombard tv stations with massive complaints due to any interruption in their viewing is beyond me. Truth is, I don’t miss them at all. I watch old clips on YouTube, and love them, and am saddened at what it has all become.
One correction: The Simpson case only pre-empted soaps in the very beginning. A few months into the murders, all shows were more or less back to regular five day a week viewing. It was not the Simpson case, IMO, that really turned people away from soaps. It was the deteriorating quality of all but a few of them. Soap audiences of just a decade earlier would never have switched off if they didn’t hate what they were seeing.
Thanks for your article, I enjoyed it much
Suz

Comment 14:

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  August 05, 2010 at 02:19 PM

Suzanne-thanks for your wonderful insightful comments.  You are right that some networks went back to the soaps, but they were forever breaking in with new OJ information in which viewers missed key scenes.  This was before the online streams and SoapNet.  More importantly, the viewers were drifting to Court TV to watch the case in progress rather than their own soaps.  Y&R which had been consistently above 8.6 in the ratings, suddenly dropped that year to 7.5 and they were still the #1 show.  That drop is significant and definitely puts the milestone where the big soap declines began.

By the way, even a few months without your soaps is death for the soap.  It’s like nicotine.  If you don’t get it, you find out you never really needed it.

YOUR COMMENTS

First Name:

Email:

Comments:

To help us fight spam please submit the following
word/numbers into the input box below the image:


Home
Our Clients
About Us
FAQ
Contact Us
Revenue & Cost Reports
Film Revenue & Cost Reports
Film ROI Reports
DVD Sales Reports
Box Office Reports
Bulk Film Data Sales
Film Business Planning Tools
Film & TV Breakouts
Film, TV, & Digital Deals Reports
Filmmaking Reports
Audience Analysis Reports
Film Production Reports
Primetime TV Insight & Online Video Now
Online Video Now
Primetime TV Insight
Custom Research


Research Wrap Newsletter

The New York Times

Baseline is a part of The New York Times Company